Preview

Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]

Advanced search

The User Satisfaction with the Quality of Library and Information Services: Research Results

https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2021-70-6-587-596

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the satisfaction of users with library and information services of the Scientific Library of Tuva State University. The main criterion of satisfaction with services is quality. Relatively large number of methods has been developed to study the quality of services provided. It is advisable to use various tools to obtain reliable and complete information about the quality of library work. In the practical activities of the Scientific Library of Tuva State University, there is most widely used statistical analysis of performance indicators, in particular, access to library resources, attendance (the library, the website, electronic library systems, etc.). To study satisfaction with the services provided by the Scientific Library of Tuva State University, there was conducted the user survey, which revealed strengths and weaknesses, as well as allowed to avoid problems in terms of customer service during the distance-learning period.

Sociological research of the Scientific Library of Tuva State University revealed the need for advanced training courses for library staff in a number of areas, to create a welcoming library environment, to change the interface of the library website, as well as the need to redesign the training programs for library specialists.

About the Author

Irina V. Podik
Tuva State University
Russian Federation

36 Lenina Str., Kyzyl, the Republic of Tuva, 667000, Russia

ORCID 0000-0003-4865-1470



References

1. Dvorkina M.Ya. Effektivnost’ i kachestvo raboty s chitatelyami: lektsiya [Efficiency and Quality of Working with Readers: lecture]. Moscow, MGIK Publ., 1988, 32 p.

2. Akhmadova Yu.A. Sistema menedzhmenta kachestva biblioteki: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie [Library Quality Management System: training and practical guide]. St. Petersburg, Professiya Publ., 2007, 264 p.

3. Stolyarov Yu.N. Kriterii otsenki bibliotechnogo obsluzhivaniya: uchebnoe posobie [Criteria for Evaluating Library Services: training manual]. Moscow, MGIK Publ., 1982, 79 p.

4. Suslova I.V., Abramova A.A. Funktsional’nye tekhnologii informatsionno-bibliotechnogo menedzhmenta: uchebnoe posobie [Functional Technologies of Information-Library Management: training manual]. St. Petersburg, Professiya Publ., 2014, 280 p.

5. Klyuev V.K. Library in the Market of Services: The New Trends and Modern Approaches, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2017, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 343—349. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2017-66-3-343-349 (in Russ.).

6. Tikunova I.P. Measuring the Quality of Library Services Is an Urgent Problem of our Time, Biblioteki i prosveshchenie v oblasti prav potrebitelei: materialy 3-go Vserossiiskogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara, Moskva, 15—16 noyabrya 2007 g. [Proceedings of the 3rd All-Russian Scientific and Practical Seminar “Libraries and Consumer Rights Education” (Moscow, November 15—16, 2007)]. Moscow, Rossiiskaya Gosudarstvennaya Biblioteka Publ., 2008, pp. 74—81 (in Russ.).

7. Redkina N.S. The Review of Modern Methods to Evaluate Users Servicing Quality, Bibliosfera [Bibliosphere], 2016, no. 3, pp. 65—73. DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2016-3-65-73 (in Russ.).

8. Redkina N.S. Everything Secret Becomes Clear: Marketing Technologies for Analyzing the Quality of Library and Information Services, Trudy GPNTB SO RAN [Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS]. Novosibirsk, 2017, issue 12, vol. 1: Biblioteka traditsionnaya i elektronnaya: smysly i tsennosti [Traditional and Electronic Library: Meanings and Values], pp. 241—248 (in Russ.).

9. Yudina T.N., Khitskov E.N., Dolgorukova I.V., Mazaev Yu.N. Sociological Measurement of the Quality of Library Information Services, POISK: Politika. Obshchestvovedenie. Iskusstvo. Sotsiologiya. Kul’tura [P.O.I.S.K: Policy. Social Science. Art. Sociology. Culture], 2017, no. 2(61), pp. 98—118 (in Russ.).

10. Slukina E.V. The Quality of Work of a University Library in the Evaluation of Users, Trudy GPNTB SO RAN [Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS]. Novosibirsk, 2017, issue 12, vol. 1: Biblioteka traditsionnaya i elektronnaya: smysly i tsennosti [Traditional and Electronic Library: Meanings and Values], pp. 257—272 (in Russ.).

11. Peschannikova E.N. Model for Evaluation of the Influence of Library Resource Distribution on Educational Service Quality, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Economics], 2018, no. 2, pp. 134—144. DOI: 10.18384/2310-6646-2018-2-134-144 (in Russ.).

12. Neustroeva A.B. Readers’ Satisfaction with the Quality and Availability of Library Services in the National Library of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Sotsiodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2018, no. 12, pp. 106—113. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2018.12.28354 (in Russ.).

13. Gubina E.V., Reshetnikova O.V. Possibilities of Popular (Recommendation) Online Bibliography in the Promotion of Reading, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2019, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 593—603. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2019-68-6-593-603 (in Russ.).

14. Kovyazina E.V. Evaluating Library Performance Using Web Metrics, Elektronnaya biblioteka i sovremennoe obrazovanie: resursy, tekhnologii, upravlenie: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 24—28 sentyabrya 2012 g., g. Krasnoyarsk [Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Electronic Library and Modern Education: Resources, Technologies, Management” (September 24—28, 2012, Krasnoyarsk)]. Krasnoyarsk, SFU Publ., 2013, pp. 76—82 (in Russ.).

15. Kann S.K. Library Website in Three Dimensions, Trudy GPNTB SO RAN [Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS]. Novosibirsk, 2017, issue 12, vol. 1: Biblioteka traditsionnaya i elektronnaya: smysly i tsennosti [Traditional and Electronic Library: Meanings and Values], pp. 413—426 (in Russ.).

16. Udartseva O.M. Analytical Systems in the Assessment of Library Web Sites, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2020, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 31—42. DOI: 10.25281/0896-608X-2020-69-1-31-42 (in Russ.).

17. Redkina N.S. Evaluating Libraries’ Activities in Social Media through Web-Analytic Means, Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2018, no. 3, pp. 16—23. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2018-3-16-23 (in Russ.).

18. Brophy P. Measuring Library Performance: Principles and Techniques. Moscow, Omega-L Publ., 2009, 357 p. (in Russ.).


  • Librarian’s qualification, intellectual level and hospitality determine the quality of the library services.
  • Comfort in the library is a significant factor which has influence of customers’ satisfaction.
  • Informativeness, accessibility, information reception in one click are performance measures of the library websites.
  • Consultations on scientometrics is one of a satisfaction indicator.
  • Wednesday is the most productive day to work in the library.

Review

For citations:


Podik I.V. The User Satisfaction with the Quality of Library and Information Services: Research Results. Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]. 2021;70(6):587-596. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2021-70-6-587-596

Views: 1044


ISSN 0869-608X (Print)
ISSN 2587-7372 (Online)