Naming of Libraries: Terminological Aspects

The article considers terminology used by the professional community for the analysis of names of public libraries. The concepts “onomastics”, “nomination”, “brand”, “branding”, “naming”, “brand-naming” are used in the marketing of library and information activities in Russia and abroad. The author notes that in the specialized literature in the USA, the problem of naming the library-information sphere is not covered in detail, and often gives way to general branding issues. The paper concludes that the special interest in the name of domestic libraries is a cultural phenomenon emanating from the value-historical context of Russia. The author stresses the relevance of this article because the naming becomes one of the most important elements of marketing strategy of organization. The increased research interest in this topic demonstrates the problem of terminological disunity. In this regard, generalization of library names (personalized, conceptual and toponymic) is substantiated, as well as the use of the term “naming” as the universal and most correct designation of activities for the creation and functioning of an effective name of an organization, product or service. Libraries bearing the names of famous writers and other famous representatives of culture and art have personalized names. The conceptual version of the name is associated with the reflection of the priority direction of the activity of the cultural institution, as well as with associative names, the basis of which is a special image. Toponymic names characterize the relationship with the territory where the library is located. Due to the active increase of libraries that have conceptual or toponymic names, the question arises about the correct terminological generalization of cultural institutions that do not have numbered designations. The author concludes that the terminological aspects of naming will be the subject of further discussions in the professional library community, because the well-established term “named library” is currently perceived as a cultural institution with a personalized name. The article is of interest to the Russian professional community, especially to librarians, library scientists and specialists of cultural universities implementing educational programs in the direction of LIS (“Library and Information Science activity”).

1. Melnichuk G.A. Onomastics of Russian Libraries (Statement of Question), Biblioteka v kontekste istorii: materialy 6-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Moskva, 4—5 oktyabrya 2005 g. [Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference “Library in the Context of History” (Moscow, October 4—5, 2005)]. Moscow, Pashkov Dom Publ., 2005, pp. 300—312 (in Russ.).

2. Podolskaya N.V. Slovar’ russkoi onomasticheskoi terminologii [Dictionary of Russian Onomastic Terminology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988, 187 p.

3. Matveev A.K. Onomastics and Onomatology: A Terminological Inquiry, Voprosy onomastiki [Problems of Onomastics], 2005, no. 2, pp. 5—10 (in Russ.).

4. Azimov E.G., Shchukin A.N. Novyi slovar’ metodicheskikh terminov i ponyatii (teoriya i praktika obucheniya yazykam) [A New Dictionary of Methodical Terms and Definitions (Theory and Practice of Language Teaching)]. Moscow, IKAR Publ., 2009, 448 p.

5. Godin A.M. Brending [Branding]. Moscow, Dashkov i K° Publ., 2016, 184 p.

6. Cherenkov V.I., Vereteno A.A. Brand and Branding: Issues of Theory and Representation, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Menedzhment [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Management], 2019, vol. 18, issue 2, pp. 145—174. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu08.2019.201 (in Russ.).

7. Kazakova T.A. Prakticheskie osnovy perevoda. English <—> Russian [Practical Basics of Translation. English <—> Russian]. St. Petersburg, Soyuz Publ., 2001, 317 p.

8. Zotov V.V. Brend-marketing [Brand Marketing]. Moscow, 2005, 36 p.

9. Frankel A. Neiming. Kak igra v slova stanovitsya biznesom [Wordcraft: The Art of Turning Little Words into Big Business]. Moscow, Dobraya Kniga Publ., 2011, 320 p.

10. Tortunova I.A. Ergonym as a Result of Verbal Creation, Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific Dialogue], 2012, no. 3, pp. 124—136 (in Russ.).

11. Malaikin S.N. Odnim slovom. Kniga dlya tekh, kto khochet pridumat’ khoroshee nazvanie. 33 uroka [In One Word. This Is a Book for Those Who Want to Come Up with a Good Name. 33 Lessons]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 2018, 304 p.

12. Kosogor O.N. How to Name Cultural Events: Naming in the Library, V pomoshch’ bibliotekam: informatsionno-metodicheskii byulleten’ [To Help Libraries: Information and Methodological Bulletin]. Vologda, VOUNB Publ., 2017, no. 61, pp. 37—51 (in Russ.).

13. Savard R. Osnovy marketinga dlya bibliotekarei, arkhivistov i dokumentalistov: rukovodstvo po prepodavaniyu kursa v vysshei shkole [Guidelines for the Teaching of Marketing in the Training of Librarians, Documentalists, and Archivists]. Moscow, 1992, part 1: 26 p., part 2: 104 p., part 3: 31 p.

14. Borchard P., Flodel S., Miltz M., Reinhardt K., Reiter G. Kontseptsiya marketinga dlya publichnykh bibliotek [Marketing Concept for Public Libraries]. Moscow, Bibliomarket Publ., 1993, 143 p.

15. Brezhneva V.V., Dementyeva N.Yu., Zhadko N.V., Zakharenko M.P., Klyuev V.K., Kolesnikova M.N. Marketing bibliotechno-informatsionnoi deyatel’nosti: uchebnik [Marketing of Library and Information Activities: textbook]. St. Petersburg, Professiya Publ., 2017, 239 p.

16. Gould M. The Library PR Handbook. American Library Association, 2009, 113 p.

17. Lackie R. Creative Library Marketing and Publicity, Rowman & Littlefield Publ., 2015, 204 p.

18. Polger M. Library Marketing Basics, Rowman & Littlefield Publ., 2019, 315 p.

19. Krause M.G. More Popular Than Ever: Perceptions of Libraries in the United States and Future Trends, Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2015, no. 7, pp. 60—80 (in Russ.).

20. Strategy for the Development of Librarianship in the Russian Federation for the Period Up to 2030: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 13, 2021, no. 608-r, Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2021, no. 12, art. 2072 (in Russ.).

21. Dvorovenko O.V. Marketing bibliotechno-informatsionnoi deyatel’nosti: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Marketing of Library and Information Activities: educational and methodological guide]. Kemerovo, 2016, 97 p.

22. Matlina S.G. Biblionymy. Library’s Name as its Symbol and Brand: (Problem Statement), Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2007, no. 4, pp. 5—14 (in Russ.).

23. Matlina S.G. “We Have Only the Name...” (Library’s Name as its Symbol and Brand), Bibliotechnoe delo [Librarianship], 2008, no. 24 (90), pp. 2—6 (in Russ.).

24. Volskaya N.V. Russia is Famous for its Names. Formation of a New Image of Libraries, Bibliotechnoe delo [Librarianship], 2017, no. 22 (304), pp. 40—44 (in Russ.).

25. The 103rd Meeting of the Board of the Russian Library Association Was Held in Moscow, Rossiiskaya bibliotechnaya assotsiatsiya: ofits. sait [Russian Library Association: official website]. Available at: http://www.rba.ru/news/news_4541.html (accessed 10.02.2022) (in Russ.).

26. Babich I.V. Names of Libraries: Trends in Sociocultural Context, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2017, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 220—227. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2017-66-2-220-227 (in Russ.).

27. Rabochaya programma distsipliny “Osnovy neiminga i kopiraitinga” [Working Program of the Discipline “Basics of Naming and Copywriting”]. Moscow, 2018, 41 p. Available at: https://www.pushkin.institute/sveden/education/RP/450301_PF/450301_PF_RPD_Osnovy_neyminga_i_kopiraytinga_2018.pdf (accessed 10.02.2022).