Preview

Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]

Advanced search

A Game of Words, or Unjustified Neologisms in Library Science (Regarding a New Article by R.A. Baryshev)

https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2024-73-2-184-190

Abstract

A response to R.A. Baryshev’s article “Proactivity, Reactivity and Interactivity in Library Activity” (pp. 173—183) is presented, in which the author continues to defend the terms proposed by him in his previous works. Neologisms in science in general and in library science in particular are necessary, they contribute to the development of the conceptual apparatus and scientific discipline as a whole. The objective need for neologisms arises when a new phenomenon is discovered, which has no name yet, and the existing terms for some reason characterize it either partially or distorted. To get out of the situation, usually use two ways: either according to the rules of terminology invent a new word, or borrow the most appropriate from related and neighboring sciences, expanding its meaning. Here are examples of neologisms “fondist”, “document”, “information resource”, “medialogy” that illustrate this provision. But there is no need to introduce the terms proposed by R.A. Baryshev, library science and library practice do without the terms artificially borrowed by him from other fields. The necessity of their introduction is not justified by the author, and their introduction is useless both theoretically and practically. The article by R.A. Baryshev does not reveal the methodology of how to anticipate the information needs of readers and there are no examples illustrating the effectiveness of the so-called proactive libraries.

About the Author

Yury N. Stolyarov
Russian State Library;Scientific and Publishing Centre “Science” of the Russian Academy of Sciences;Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology
Russian Federation

Russian State Library,
3/5 Vozdvizhenka Str., Moscow, 119019, Russia

Scientific and Publishing Centre “Science” of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
90 Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russia

Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology,
17, 3rd Khoroshevskaya Str., Moscow, 123298, Russia

ORCID 0000-0002-9597-4275; SPIN 7795-3767



References

1. Stolyarov Yu.N. The Idea of “Proactive Library” in R.A. Baryshev’s Monograph and Dissertation as Manifestation of Dilettantism, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2022, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 413—421. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2022-71-4-413-421 (in Russ.).

2. On Obligatory Copy of Documents: Federal Law of December 29, 1994, no. 77-FZ, Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 1995, no. 1, art. 1 (in Russ.).

3. Shvetsova-Vodka G.N. Documentation or Documentary? The Approach Cannot Be Formal, Bibliografiya [Bibliography], 1997, no. 5, pp. 33—37. Available at: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_011806906 (accessed 28.12.2023) (in Russ.).

4. Korshunov O.P. Once Again About Terminology, Bibliografiya [Bibliography], 1999, no. 5, pp. 156—157. Available at: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_011806957 (accessed 28.12.2023) (in Russ.).

5. Stolyarov Yu.N. Terms Derived from the Word Document, Nauchnye i tekhnicheski biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2000, no. 10, pp. 64—68 (in Russ.).

6. Vinogradova E.B. Documentological Thesaurus: Analysis and Use, Nauchnye i tekhnicheski biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2014, no. 5, pp. 67—73 (in Russ.).

7. Shvetsova-Vodka G.N. Yu.N. Stolyarov About Documentology, Nauchnye i tekhnicheski biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2014, no. 6, pp. 66—80 (in Russ.).

8. Stolyarov Yu.N. Documentological Thesaurus, Libraries and Information Resources in the Present-Day World of Science, Culture, Education and Business: The 11th International Conference “Crimea 2004”. Moscow, GPNTB Rossii Publ., 2004, 5 p. (in Russ.).

9. Shvetsova-Vodka G.N. Documentological Terminology of Yu.N. Stolyarov, Terminology of Document Science and Related Field of Knowledge: collected articles. Kiev, 2014, issue 8, pp. 61—74 (in Russ.).

10. Levin G.L. Standardized Bibliographic Terminology: The Modern State of Art, Bibliografiya i knigovedenie [Bibliography and Bibliology], 2023, no. 1, pp. 73—97. DOI: 10.25281/2411-2305-2023-1-73-97 (in Russ.).

11. Ehlyashevich D.A. Bibliology: Life After Death, Book and Book Business in the 19th—20th Century: Proceedings of St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture. 2018, vol. 217, pp. 55—81 (in Russ.).

12. Ehlyashevich D.A. “Renaissance of Bibliology”, the Book Studies and More, Library Potential in the Modern World: Transformations, Prospects: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation, Samara, May 25, 2021. Samara, 2021, pp. 117—126 (in Russ.).

13. GOST 16487—83. Case Management and Archival Business. Terms and Definitions. Moscow, Gosudarstvennyi Komitet SSSR po Standartam Publ., 12 p. (in Russ.).

14. Stolyarov Yu.N. Library Documentology, Nauchnye i tekhnicheski biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2021, no. 5, pp. 61—72. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2021-5-61-72 (in Russ.).

15. GOST R ISO 15489-1—2019. System of Standards on Information, Librarianship and Publishing. Information and Documentation. Document Management. Part 1. Concepts and Principles. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2019, 17 p. (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Stolyarov Yu.N. A Game of Words, or Unjustified Neologisms in Library Science (Regarding a New Article by R.A. Baryshev). Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]. 2024;73(2):184-190. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2024-73-2-184-190

Views: 331


ISSN 0869-608X (Print)
ISSN 2587-7372 (Online)