Quality of Reading of Sector-Based Literature: Criterion-Oriented Approach

The article considers such notions as “Quality of Reading”, “Criterion”, “Sector-Based Literature”, “Motivation”, and “Efficiency”. There is described the system of criteria of reading of sector-based literature in accordance with the cluster principle, as well as their integration into the library and information services. The criteria of quality of reading are proved as ties of social and personal socialization of readers. There is outlined the possibility of transition of reading skills “from information to knowledge and to the methodology of acquisition of knowledge” in the context of reader’s socialization as strategy of life and education.

Quality, Criteria, Clusters, Readers’ Practices, Motivation, Functions, Text Models, Cognition, Efficiency, Reflection

1. Belyaeva L.I. Osnovaniya i kriterii tipologii chitatelei khudozhestvennoi literatury, Problemy differentsiatsii chitatelei i psikhologii chteniya. Leningrad, LGIK im. N.K. Krupskoi, 1980, pp. 76—87.

2. Trubnikov S.A. Kul’tura chteniya kak kriterii obshchei tipologii chitatelei, Sovetskoe bibliotekovedenie, 1980, no. 1, pp. 28—38.

3. Melent’eva Yu.P. O chtenii : Razmyshleniya o teoreticheskikh aspektakh chteniya. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2014, 184 p.

4. Rubakin N.A. Sredi knig, Izbrannoe [Selected Works]. Moscow, 1975, vol. 1, pp. 105—210.

5. Rubakin N.A. Pis’ma k chitatelyam o samoobrazovanii, Izbrannoe [Selected Works]. Moscow, 1975, vol. 2, pp. 3—126.

6. Borodina V.A. Izuchenie produktivnosti chitatel’skoi deyatel’nosti kak kompleksnaya problema, Kompleksnyi podkhod k rukovodstvu chteniem i propagande literatury. Leningrad, 1985, pp. 150—163.

7. Borodina V.A. K metodike izmereniya produktivnosti chteniya, Problemy differentsiatsii chitatelei i psikhologii chteniya. Leningrad, 1980, pp. 141—152.

8. Borodina V.A. Teoriya i tekhnologiya chitatel’skogo razvitiya v otechestvennom bibliotekovedenii. Moscow, 2006, 336 p.

9. Borodina V.A. Chitatel’skaya deyatel’nost’: teoreticheskii aspect, Psikhologiya chteniya i problemy tipologii chitatelei, vol. 90. Leningrad, 1984, pp. 6—28.

10. Val’dgard S.L. Ocherki psikhologii chteniya. Moscow, 1931, 112 p.

11. Zagashev I.O., Zair-Bek S.I. Kriticheskoe myshlenie: tekhnologiya razvitiya. St. Petersburg, 2003, 284 p.

12. Maslova O.M. Nekotorye aspekty formirovaniya sistemy pokazatelei v sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh chitatel’skoi auditorii, Sotsiologiya i psikhologiya chteniya. Moscow, 1979, vol. 15, pp. 74—101.

13. Khanin M.G. Sotsial’nye funktsii pechati i lichnostnye funktsii chteniya, Sotsiologiya i psikhologiya chteniya. Moscow, 1979, vol. 15, pp. 58—73.

14. Galeeva I.S. K voprosu o metodakh izucheniya pol’zovatelei: registratsiya dvizheniya glaz pri rabote s internet-stranitsami, Informatsionno-bibliograficheskoe obsluzhivanie. St. Petersburg, 2010, pp. 116—123.

15. Lamminpiya A., Zashchirinskaya O.V., Shelepin Yu.E. Ponimanie morali skazok na primere izucheniya glazodvigatel’nykh reaktsii, Neironauka v psikhologii, obrazovanii, meditsine. St. Petersburg, 2014, pp. 16—22.

16. Troshin A.Ya. Psikhologicheskie osnovy protsessa chteniya. St. Petersburg, 1900, 73 p.

17. Yarbus A.L. Dvizhenie glaz v protsesse chteniya, Rol’ dvizheniya glaz v protsesse zreniya. Moscow, 1965, pp. 148—151.