Analyzing and Building an Advertising Image of the Library through User Interviews

Over the past decades, advertising for the library has become a mandatory part of the activity, but the approach to its creation is largely based on accepted stereotypes that express the most common ideas about the properties of such a complex phenomenon as the target audience of the library. Advertising can be expressed through an advertising image that contains not only objective but also subjective information; it uses associations, metaphors, emotions, visualization of something that has a generalizing character, i. e. a layer of implicit information is added to the exact data and read automatically. One of the problems of creating an advertising image may be that there are contradictions between the perception of the person who creates an advertising based on a stereotype and its recipient. The article reflects the experience of the State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPSTL SB RAS) in the study of two groups — “Event visitors” and “Readers”. The study involved 326 people (254 visitors to mass events and 72 readers of the SPSTL SB RAS). The author tested the method of semi-formalized interview to get relevant information for better understanding the audience’s motivation and desires. It is assumed to use pre-made plan with a list of mandatory questions, while using general wording and their variations, “close to the text”, and observing the general logic in their sequence.

The author analyses the data on distribution of users in both groups (“Event visitors” and “Readers”) by the age categories and employment areas; frequency of library visits; frequency of references to forms of work that are called in demand and found interesting in both groups; frequency of references to preferred information channels. The article presents the main positions for creating an advertising image of the library. The author shows the expediency of using the semi-formalized interview method to adjust the advertising image of the library and the campaign to promote events, resources and services based on it, both for individual groups and for several segments in parallel, if the library’s event or service does not have a specific addressee. The article reveals the method of work that can be applied in the analysis of the advertising image for other libraries.

1. Adamyants T.Z. Mass Media Audience as a Subject and an Object of the Communicational Interaction, Chelovek [The Human Being], 2018, no. 3, pp. 96—107 (in Russ.).

2. Solovyov A.V. Mediacity and the Human: Distant Involvement, Chelovek [The Human Being], 2017, no. 5, pp. 100—107 (in Russ.).

3. Redkina N.S. Global Trends of Libraries Development: Optimism vs Pessimism (Foreign Literature Review). Part 1, Bibliosfera [Bibliosphere], 2019, no. 1, pp. 49—58. DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2019-1-49-58 (in Russ.).

4. Petersen J.H., Kooistra R.B. Rethinking Libraries in the Book Business, Public Library Quarterly, 2019, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 64—88. DOI: 10.1080/01616846.2019.1604040.

5. Shohama S., Klain-Gabbayb L. The Academic Library: Structure, Space, Physical and Virtual Use, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2019, vol. 45, no. 5. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102053.

6. Grishanin N.V., Tulubyev V.B., Lysanova D.V., Lyubetskaya A.G. The Perception of Libraries by Young Audience: The Approaches to the Formation of Publicity Capital, Kommunikologiya [Communicology], 2019, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 51—65. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-51-65 (in Russ.).

7. Fernández-Ardèvol M., Ferran-Ferrer N., Nieto-Arroyo J., Fenoll C. The Public Library as Seen by the Non-Users, Profesional de la información, 2018, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 659—670. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2018.may.19.

8. Leshukov A.G., Chebotarev A.M. Design of Communication Products: Current Trends in the Cultural Space of the City, Vestnik kul’tury i iskusstv [Culture and Arts Herald], 2018, no. 4 (56), pp. 97—103 (in Russ.).

9. Savchenko D.G. About the Concept of Advertising Image, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities], 2018, no. 18 (816), pp. 308—319 (in Russ.).

10. Harlow S., Hill K. Assessing Library Online Patrons Use of Resources to Improve Outreach and Marketing, The Serials Librarian, 2020, vol. 78. Published online: 04 Mar 2020. DOI: 10.1080/0361526X.2019.1703873.

11. Larina A.V., Matveeva M.S. The Importance of Cultural Codes and Stereotypes in the Context of Semiotics of Media Tourist Advertisement, Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya [The World of Science, Culture and Education], 2019, no. 4 (77), pp. 445—447 (in Russ.).

12. Hamlett A., Georgas H. In the Wake of Discovery: Student Perceptions, Integration, and Instructional Design, Journal of Web Librarianship, 2019, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 230—245. DOI: 10.1080/19322909.2019.1598919.

13. Vakkari P., Mikkonen A. The Role of Readers’ Literary Preferences in Predicting Success in Fiction Search, Journal of Documentation, 2019, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 317—332. DOI: 10.1108/JD-01-2019-0005.

14. Khan A., Masrek M., Mahmood K. The Relationship of Personal Innovativeness, Quality of Digital Resources and Generic Usability with Users’ Satisfaction: A Pakistani Perspective, Digital Library Perspectives, 2019, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 15—30. DOI: 10.1108/DLP-12-2017-0046.

15. Borisova O.O., Stepina N.A. Independent Assessment of the Quality of Service Delivery (From the Experience of the Centralized Library System in Orel), Kul’tura: teoriya i praktika [Culture: Theory and Practice], 2020, no. 1 (34), p. 75—84 (in Russ.).

16. Lo P., He M., Liu Y. Social Inclusion and Social Capital of the Shanghai Library as a Community Place for Self-Improvement, Library Hi Tech, 2019, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 197—218. DOI: 10.1108/LHT-04-2018-0056.

17. Sundareswaran N. User Perception of Library Services in Public Libraries in Western Tamilnadu with Special Reference to Salem District: a Case Study, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2019. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2951/ (accessed 18.05.2020).

18. Veselkova N.V. Methodological Principles of a Semi-Formalized Interview, Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie [Sociology: Methodology, Methods and Mathematical Modeling], 1995, no. 5—6, pp. 28—47 (in Russ.).

19. Chekhovsky I.V. Interview as a Tool to Obtain Information in Qualitative Research Strategy, Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology], 2009, no. 4, pp. 20—25 (in Russ.).

20. Rykhtorova A.E. User Segmentation for the Development of Library Websites, Informatsionnye resursy Rossii [Information Resources of Russia], 2019, no. 2 (168), pp. 20—24 (in Russ.).

21. Pyati A.K. Public Libraries as Contemplative Spaces: A Framework for Action and Research, Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 2019, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 356—370. DOI: 10.1080/24750158.2019.1670773.