Preview

Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]

Advanced search

Support of Scientific Research as Libraries’ Field of Activity

https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2020-69-6-567-579

Abstract

Support of scientific research as a field of activity is one of the leading topics discussed in the professional library, especially foreign, periodicals. In 2020, there was conducted the analysis of research support services provided by research libraries of domestic and foreign universities. Based on the experience of the 2017’ study, the authors divided all research support services into two groups for the analysis of 2020: information and library services and general scientific services. Information and library services include all those that the library traditionally provides to its readers and users, taking into account the development of modern information technologies. General scientific services are essentially a certain continuation of the work with information that researchers have already received in the course of their work. For the analysis of research universities, the authors selected Russian universities that were included in the Shanghai ranking of world universities for 2020 (there are nine of them), followed by the same number of foreign universities. Comparison of the results of the 2017’ and 2020’ studies showed that university libraries have found stable, relevant directions and forms of communication with scientists. They can be grouped as follows: preparation and maintenance of special resources that are a priori useful to researchers for obtaining information necessary for conducting, promoting and organizing scientific research; assistance in preparing publications; assistance in using tools for scientific communication; assistance in working with research data; assistance in working with scientometric data; comprehensive support for scientific research. The article indicates that the core of this area of library and information activity has been formed over the past four years. The only significant difference in the activities of research libraries of foreign and domestic universities is that the latter do not offer data management services. The authors draw attention to the appearance in library activities of such type of services as “help”/assistance on the websites of libraries of domestic and foreign universities. The authors propose to consider it in the “help — consulting — support” paradigm, which reflects the competence level of the librarian.

About the Authors

Olga L. Lavrik
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

15 Voskhod Str., Novosibirsk, 630200, Russia

ORCID 0000-0001-8859-8921; SPIN 8304-3655



Tatyana A. Kalyuzhnaya
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

15 Voskhod Str., Novosibirsk, 630200, Russia

ORCID 0000-0001-8637-2793; SPIN 5315-0638



References

1. Lavrik O.L., Kalyuzhnaya T.A., Pleshakova M.A. Library and its University: The Experience of Research Support, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2017, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 643—650. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2017-66-6-643-650 (in Russ.).

2. Tibor K. Are You Ready? Tasks and Roles for Academic Libraries in Supporting Research 2.0, New Library World, 2016, vol. 117, no. 1/2, pp. 94—104. DOI: 10.1108/NLW-09-2015-0062.

3. Suiter A.M., Moulaison H.L. Supporting Scholars: An Analysis of Academic Library Websites’ Documentation on Metrics and Impact, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2015, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 814—820. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.004.

4. Costello L. Survey of Canadian Academic Librarians Outlines Integration of Traditional and Emerging Services, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2020, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 184—186. DOI: 10.18438/eblip29789.

5. Lavrik O.L. The Features of Scientific Researches in Libraries of Different Status, Trudy GPNTB SO RAN [Proceedings of the State Public Scientific and Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2016, no. 10, pp. 6—17 (in Russ.).

6. Researchers’ Use of Academic Libraries and their Services: A Report Commissioned by the Research Information Network and the Consortium of Research Libraries, Research Information Network, 2007. Available at: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/263868/1/libraries-report-2007.pdf (accessed 23.03.2020).

7. Morriello R. Birth and Development of Data Librarianship, Italian Journal of Library, Archives, and Information Science, 2020, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1—15. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-12653.

8. Bains S. Manchester’s New Order: Transforming the Academic Library Support Model, Research Libraries UK (RLUK). Available at: http://www.rluk.ac.uk/news/manchestersneworder/ (accessed 23.03.2020).

9. Thomas A., Martin E.R. Developing a Community of Practice: Building the Research Data Management Librarian Academy, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 2020, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 323—333. DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1826185.

10. Leading Russian Universities, Natsional’nyi issledovatel’skii universitet “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki” [National Research University “Higher School of Economics”]. Available at: https://strategy.hse.ru/niu (accessed 23.03.2020) (in Russ.).

11. Jaguszewski J.M., Williams K. New Roles for New Times: Transforming Liaison Roles in Research Libraries. Washington, ARL Publ., 2013. Available at: https://www.arl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/nrnt-liaison-roles-revised.pdf (accessed 23.03.2020).

12. Bains S. Teaching “Old” Librarians New Tricks, SCONUL Focus, 2013, no. 58, pp. 8—11.

13. Doskatsch I. Perceptions and Perplexities of the Faculty Librarian Partnership: An Australian Perspective, Reference Services Review, 2003, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 111—121. DOI: 10.1108/00907320310476585.

14. Rodwell J., Fairburn L. Dangerous Liaisons? Defining the Faculty Liaison Librarians Service Model, Its Effectiveness and Sustainability, Library Management, 2008, vol. 29, no. 1/2, pp. 116—124. DOI: 10.1108/01435120810844694.

15. Cain T.J., Cheek F.M., Kupsco J. et al. Health Sciences Libraries Forecasting Information Service Trends for Researchers: Models Applicable to All Academic Libraries, College and Research Libraries, 2016, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 595—613. DOI: 10.5860/crl.77.5.595.


Review

For citations:


Lavrik O.L., Kalyuzhnaya T.A. Support of Scientific Research as Libraries’ Field of Activity. Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]. 2020;69(6):567-579. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2020-69-6-567-579

Views: 971


ISSN 0869-608X (Print)
ISSN 2587-7372 (Online)