Measuring the Digital Future: Digital Maturity Models as a Tool for Library Development

This article explores the application of digital maturity (DM) models for assessing and managing the digital transformation (DT) of libraries. It is noted that DM models are actively studied in the academic community, and references are provided to the works of domestic and international researchers who have contributed to the development of this field. The purpose of this article is to analyze the structure and main characteristics of DM models, their classification, and applicability for assessing the level of DT in libraries. The objectives include an overview of existing approaches to DM assessment, identifying commonalities and divergences between different models, and determining the key parameters assessed using these models. This paper utilizes an analytical review of the scientific literature on DM models, their structure, operating principles, and practical application. A comparative analysis of DM models is conducted to identify commonalities and divergences. It is emphasized the potential of multi-stage models that evaluate both quantitative indicators and expert assessments. The author identifies the parameters assessed using DM models: the presence of a clear digital strategy and its support by management, effective data management, the availability of a modern IT infrastructure, the development of a digital culture among staff, and process automation. Key elements of the models are also highlighted: key areas (domains), evaluation criteria, and metrics. An example of a DM model based on the Digital Transformation Quality Standard is provided. DM models are an effective tool for identifying priority areas for the further development of libraries in the digital environment. This article is of interest to a wide range of specialists interested in DT, including organizational executives, IT specialists, analysts, and consultants. The results of the study can be used to select and adapt the most appropriate model for assessing the DM of a specific library.

1. On the National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2030 and for the Future up to 2036: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2024, no. 309, Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2024, no. 20, art. 2584 (in Russ.).

2. Kapterev A.I., Tikunova I.P. The Library Agenda in the Regional Strategies of Digital Transformation of the RF Entities, Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki [Scientific and Technical Libraries], 2025, no. 3, pp. 161—180. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2025-3-161-180 (in Russ.).

3. Methodological Recommendations for the Digital Transformation of State Corporations and Companies with State Participation: Approved on January 12, 2024, Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation: official website. Available at: https://digital.gov.ru/uploaded/files/140020231228obnovlennyiemetodicheskierekomendatsiiv12sokraschennyie-1.pdf (accessed 15.01.2026) (in Russ.).

4. Teichert R. Digital Transformation Maturity: A Systematic Review of Literature, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2019, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1673—1687. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967061673.

5. Musina D.R., Ganieva M.R. Digital Maturity of Industry and Enterprise: Concept and Assessment Methods, Human Progress, 2024, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1—13. DOI: 10.46320/2073-4506-2024-4a-22 (in Russ.).

6. Tabachuk N.P. Information Competence, Computational Thinking, Digital Maturity. Khabarovsk, 2023, 117 p. (in Russ.).

7. Rossmann A. Digital Maturity: Conceptualization and Measurement Model, 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018): Bridging the Internet of People, Data, and Things, San Francisco, California, USA, 13—16 December 2018. San Francisco, 2018, pp. 1633—1641.

8. Aslanova I.V., Kulichkina A.I. Research and Assessment of a Digital Maturity of the Organization, Clustering of the Digital Economy: Theory and Practice. St. Petersburg, 2020, pp. 602—626. DOI: 10.18720/IEP/2020.6/24 (in Russ.).

9. Kane G.C. Digital Maturity, Not Digital Transformation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 2017, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1—15.

10. Kirillina Yu.V. Digital Transformation and Digital Maturity of an Organization, Aktual’nye nauchnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire [Current Research in the Modern World], 2020, no. 7-3 (63), pp. 72—80 (in Russ.).

11. Kuzin D.V. Problems of Digital Maturity in Modern Business, Mir novoi ehkonomiki [The World of New Economy], 2019, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 89—99. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-3-89-99 (in Russ.).

12. Polyakova T.A., Minbaleev A.V. The Concept and Legal Nature of Digital Maturity, Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2021, no. 9, pp. 107—116. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520016732-6 (in Russ.).

13. Alimzhanov A.K. On the Issue of Defining the Category of “Digital Maturity” in the Era of Digital Transformation of the Energy Sector and Its Impact on Financial Performance, Russian Economic Bulletin, 2024, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 324—329. DOI: 10.58224/2658-5286-2024-7-3-324-329 (in Russ.).

14. Thordsen T., Bick M. A Decade of Digital Maturity Models: Much Ado About Nothing? Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2023, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 947—976. DOI: 10.1007/s10257-023-00656-w.

15. Abramov V.I., Borzov A.V., Semenkov K.Yu. Theoretical and Methodological Analysis of Digital Maturity Models for Russian Companies, Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Seriya: Ehkonomika, finansy i upravlenie proizvodstvom [News of Higher Educational Institutions. Series: Economics, Finance and Production Management], 2021, no. 4 (50), pp. 42—51. DOI: 10.6060/ivecofin.2021504.566 (in Russ.).

16. Balakhonova I.V. Assessing Digital Maturity as a First Step Towards Digital Transformation of an Industrial Enterprise: monograph. Penza, 2021, 274 p. (in Russ.).

17. Korshunov A.A., Lozhkina S.L. Methodology for Assessing the Digital Maturity of a Company, Management and Economics of the National Economy of Russia: Proceedings of the 9th Int. Scient. and Pract. Conf. Penza, 2025, pp. 217—224 (in Russ.).

18. Shipkova O.T., Shkolnik K.S. Methodology for Assessing the Corporation Digital Maturity Based on Open Data, Ehkonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow], 2023, vol. 13, no. 8A, pp. 356—367. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2023.93.77.033 (in Russ.).

19. Carrijo P., Alturas B., Pedrosa I. Similarities and Differences Between Digital Transformation Maturity Models: A Literature Review, Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 2023, vol. 549, pp. 33—52. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16598-6_2.

20. Langer B. Understanding Data & Analytics Maturity: A Systematic Review of Maturity Model Composition, Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 2025, vol. 77, pp. 205—227. DOI: 10.1007/s41471-024-00205-2.

21. Tubis A.A. Digital Maturity Assessment Model for the Organizational and Process Dimensions, Sustainability. 2023, vol. 15, no. 20, 151122. DOI: 10.3390/su152015122.

22. Kapterev A.I. Managing Digital Transformation of Libraries: Russian Specifics: monograph. Moscow, Book-Expert Publ., 2023, 267 p. (in Russ.).

23. Kapterev A.I. Methodology for Assessing the Digital Transformation of Libraries, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2023, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 295—309. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2023-72-4-295-309 (in Russ.).

24. Varnavsky A.V., Volkova E.S., Buryakova A.O., Klimova E.A. Model for Assessing Digital Leadership of Organization, Vestnik Universiteta, 2020, no. 4, pp. 23—32. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2020-4-23-32 (in Russ.).

25. Westerman G., Bonnet D., McAfee A. The Nine Elements of Digital Transformation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 2014, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1—6.

26. Kane G.C., Palmer D., Phillips A.N., Kiron D., Buckley N. Coming of Age Digitally: Learning, Leadership, and Legacy, MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte Insights, 2018, June. Available at: https://thegrowthstrategygroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/MIT-Deloitte-Coming-of-Age-Digitally.pdf (accessed 15.01.2026).

27. Zhiltsov D.A. Using a Matrix of Arthur D. Little in Strategic Marketing, The Creative Legacy of A.S. Posnikov and the Modern Times, 2016, no. 10, pp. 320—325 (in Russ.).

28. Digital Transformation: Digital Transformation Quality Standard: The Self-Assessment Methodology. Moscow, 2024, 14 p. (in Russ.).

29. Tiwari A., Madalli D.P. Maturity Models in LIS Study and Practice, Library & Information Science Research, 2021, vol. 43, no. 1, 101069. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101069.

30. Marquet A. A Maturity Model for Measuring Digital Transformation of Archives and Libraries, Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2021, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 269—282.

31. Kosolapov M.S. Likert Scale, A Dictionary of Sociology. Moscow, 2015, pp. 372—373 (in Russ.).

32. Zhang Sh., Yao F., Cheng Ya. An Assessment of Data Analytics-Based Decision Making for Digital Transformation in University Libraries, Archives des Sciences, 2024, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 221—225. DOI: 10.62227/as/74229.

33. Hart S., Amos H. The Library Assessment Capability Maturity Model: A Means of Optimizing How Libraries Measure Effectiveness, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2018, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 31—49. DOI: 10.18438/eblip29471.

34. Libraries Sector Data, Research and Evidence Strategy Maturity Model, National Library of New Zealand: website. 2022, June. Available at: https://natlib.govt.nz/files/nzlpp/nzlpp-data-research-evidence-maturity-model.pdf (accessed 15.01.2026).

35. Sheikhshoaei F., Naghshineh N., Alidousti S., Nakhoda M. Design of a Digital Library Maturity Model (DLMM), The Electronic Library, 2018, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 607—619. DOI: 10.1108/EL-05-2017-0114.

36. Keshavarz H., Norouzi Y. A Maturity Model for Digital Information Management in University Libraries: A Design Science Study, International Information and Library Review, 2022, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 299—314. DOI: 10.1080/10572317.2021.2022388.

37. Kapterev A.I. (ed.) Digital Transformation of Public Libraries: A Study of the Current State and Forecasting Development: Research Report (Interim). Moscow, 2026, 123 p. (in Russ.).